• Aleksandr Kudrya National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”
  • Elina Sokolovskaya National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”
  • Vitaly Perezhogin National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”
  • Ngo Ngoc Ha National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”
Keywords: structure morphology, etching, noise filtering, excess and asymmetry coefficients, field of view area, digital image, structure and fracture images, banding image in microstructure, image processing procedures


The traditional approach to ranking structures and fractures as the comparison with standards (pictures) does not allow to objectively describe the existing diversity of their geometry, to provide the direct comparison of the morphology of structures and fractures to identify critical parameters of structures determining the difference in their resistance to fracture. Formalization of approaches to the description of digital images of structures and fractures is complicated, in particular, due to the differences in the mechanisms of destruction of nominally similar structures that differ in the geometry of the structure of its individual elements and their configuration as a whole; the resulting differences in the metrological support of image processing procedures. It is usually understood that this is provided by default within the framework of the specialized software products used, but in practice, the necessary attention to comparing the alternative options for image processing procedures to choose the optimal one is not always paid.

In this regard, the paper considers some aspects of obtaining digital images of structures and fractures, their processing, providing reproducible and comparable results that carry meaningful information about their morphology. In particular, the authors evaluated the role of the etching duration, the choice of the optimal magnification of the microscope (in the range of values comparable in their capabilities to solve a specific problem), and the noise removal procedure. The paper discusses the approaches to the selection of effective image processing algorithms, for example, when changing over from the point estimates of structures to the measuring of their geometry (taking into account the ideas about the statistical nature of structures and fractures, measurement scales). The authors estimated the efficiency of using classical and nonparametric statistics when comparing the results of measurements of the structures and fractures geometry, and the possibility of classifying “blurry” images of microstructures based on the Fourier transform.

Based on the results obtained, the authors reviewed some procedures for processing the images of structures and fractures and showed that the use of statistical characteristics of images of structures and fractures makes it possible to rank more objectively the structures according to their geometry.

Author Biographies

Aleksandr Kudrya , National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”

Doctor of Sciences (Engineering), professor of Chair of Metal Science and Strength Physics

Elina Sokolovskaya , National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”

PhD (Engineering), assistant professor of Chair of Metal Science and Strength Physics

Vitaly Perezhogin , National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”

postgraduate student of Chair of Metal Science and Strength Physics

Ngo Ngoc Ha, National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”

postgraduate student of Chair of Metal Science and Strength Physics


1. Shtremel M.A. Prochnost’ splavov. Ch. 2. Deformatsiya [The strength of alloys. Part 2. Deformation]. Moscow, MISIS Publ., 1997. 527 p.
2. Shtremel M.A. Razrushenie. Kn. 2. Razrushenie struktur [Destruction. Book 2. Destruction of structures]. Moscow, MISIS Publ., 2015. 976 p.
3. Sokolovskaya E.A. On the results reproducibility of structures and fractures measurements using computerized procedures. Voprosy materialovedeniya, 2013, no. 4, pp. 143–153.
4. Mikhaylovich A.P., Sivkova T.A., Kadushnikov R.M., Somina S.V. Metallographic analysis: history and development prospects. Mir izmereniy, 2014, no. 2, pp. 3–9.
5. Kolpishon E.Yu., Durynin V.A., Kazakov A.A., Zhitenev A.I., Titova T.I., Malykhina O.Yu. Metallographie examination of semi-finished metallurgical products of critical parts of power plant industry and automation of microstructure research methods. Tyazheloe mashinostroenie, 2016, no. 11-12, pp. 2–8.
6. Yatsenko R.V., Ternovoy Yu.F., Yatsenko M.Yu. Use of modern means of quantitative metallography. Metallurgicheskaya i gornorudnaya promyshlennost, 2012, no. 1, pp. 59–64.
7. Duval L., Moreaud M., Couprie C., Jeulin D., Talbot H., Angulo J. Image processing for materials characterization: issues, challenges and opportunities. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). Paris, 2014, pp. 4862–4866.
8. Kudrya A.V., Sokolovskaya E.A., Trachenko V.A., Skorodumov S.V., Papina K.B., Mishnev P.A., Paligin R.B., Balashov S.A., Ogol’tsov A.A. Quality nonuniformity factors for sheet steel. Russian Metallurgy (Metally), 2014, vol. 2014, no. 6, pp. 489–497.
9. Kudrya A.V., Sokolovskaya E.A., Akhmedova T.Sh., Perezhogin V.Yu. Information content of hard alloy structures morphology for the forecast of facing quality. Tsvetnye metally, 2017, no. 12, pp. 78–83.
10. Saltykov S.A. Stereometricheskaya metallografiya [Stereometric metallography]. Moscow, Metallurgiya Publ., 1970. 376 p.
11. Anisovich A.G. Modern metallography – the basis of foundry material science. Lit’e i metallurgiya, 2019, no. 2, pp. 99–108.
12. Israfilov H.S. Research of methods for binarisation of images. Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya, 2017, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 43–50.
13. Malage A., Rege P.P., Rathod M.J. Automatic quantitative analysis of microstructure of ductile cast iron using digital image processing. Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, 2015, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 155–165.
14. Vander Voort G.F. Metallography: Principles and Practice. ASM International, 1999. 752 p.
15. Anisovich A.G. The sharpness of the images in metallography. Lit’e i metallurgiya, 2018, no. 3, pp. 76–81.
16. Kudrya A.V., Sokolovskaya E.A., Perezhogin V.Yu., Akhmedova T.Sh., Vasil’ev S.G. Use of computerized procedure for evaluation of inhomogeneity of hard alloys structures. Metallurg, 2016, no. 12, pp. 77–80.
17. Kazakov A.A., Zhitenev A.I., Salynova M.A. Estimation of single large nonmetallic inclusions in steel using statistics of extreme values. Chernye metally, 2018, no. 11, pp. 70–74.
18. Shapiro L., Stokman J. Kompyuternoe zrenie [Computer vision]. Moscow, BINOM. Laboratoriya znaniy Publ., 2013. 752 p.
19. Gonsales R., Vuds R., Eddins S. Tsifrovaya obrabotka izobrazheniy [Digital image processing]. Moscow, Tekhnosfera Publ., 2005. 1072 p.
20. Kazakov A.A., D. Kiselev D.V., Pakhomova O.V. Microstructural Quantification for Pipeline Steel Structure-Property Relationships. CIS Iron and Steel Review, 2012, no. 1, pp. 4–12.
Technical Sciences