THE INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SENIOR OFFICERS – THE PARTICIPANTS OF COMBAT ACTIONS

  • Ualit Salamatovich Aliyev Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Keywords: military personnel, individual psychological characteristics, top commanders, combatants, stressful situation, experiencing stress, nervous breakdown, anxiety, mental disorder, stress resistance, participation in hostilities, senior officers who took part in hostilities

Abstract

Today, the identity of a serviceman participating in local wars and armed conflicts is one of the most relevant research topics for the Russian military psychology, and the psychological consequences of combat psychological trauma are the area of mutual scientific and practical interests of both civilian and military specialists. The personality of senior officers-combatants is of particular interest. This is due to the fact that they face the influence of various factors and situations when solving their combat missions. To solve combat missions successfully, senior officers-combatants need to have both professional skills and certain psychological characteristics. The paper shows the results of the comparative analysis of individual psychological characteristics (stress resistance, anxiety, the ability to adapt to the new life conditions, the preferred forms of coping behavior) of the top commanders of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation who participated in combat operations (the experimental group) and their colleagues who did not participate in the hostilities. The study showed that senior officers who took part in hostilities were more prone to neuro-psychic breakdowns than their colleagues who did not take part in hostilities. Senior officers-combatants are characterized by a significantly higher level of personal anxiety expressed in the tendency to consider a wide range of situations as a threat to themselves; they show more pronounced indicators of social maladjustment. Moreover, the author identified that senior commanders who took part in hostilities were at most prone to use non-constructive strategies to overcome stressful situations.

Author Biography

Ualit Salamatovich Aliyev, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia

PhD (Law), Master of Psychology, external student of the Institute of Psychology

References

Shamrey V.K., Lytkin V.M. The dynamics of personality changes in combatants of local wars and armed conflicts. Voenno-meditsinskiy zhurnal, 2006, vol. 327, no. 7, pp. 4–10.

Zelyanina A.N. Personality traits dynamics in veterans with war traumas of different severity. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal, 2012, no. 1, pp. 3–25.

Lavrova E.E. Personal deformations of participants in military conflicts. Molodoy uchenyy, 2015, no. 18, pp. 332–336.

Boev O.I., Lekomtseva O.V., Boev I.V. Psychophysiological characteristic of soldiers, combat veterans. Meditsinskiy vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza, 2016, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 547–550.

Terekhova T.A., Fontalova N.S. Combatant stress effect on the mental health of military actions participants. Psikhologiya v ekonomike i upravlenii, 2014, no. 1, pp. 71–75.

Strelnikova Yu.Yu. The changes of the personality in the military conditions in the term of psychic norms. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2013, no. 4, pp. 187–192.

Lazebnaya E.O. Traumatic stressful situation and post-traumatic adaptation process. Psikhologiya sostoyaniy: khrestomatiya. Moscow, Rech Publ., 2004, pp. 373–386.

Krasnova O.V. Study of problems of former servicemen in the context of the life cycle. Psikhologiya zrelosti i stareniya, 2004, no. 3, pp. 52–78.

Padun M.A., Tarabrina N.V., Kharlamenkova N.E. Intensivnyy stress v kontekste psikhologicheskoy bezopasnosti [Intensive stress in the context of psychological security]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr Publ., 2017. 344 p.

Lazebnaya E.O., Zelenova M.E. The subjective and situational determinants of successful posttraumatic readjustment of combatants. Psikhologiya adaptatsii i sotsialnaya sreda: sovremennye podkhody, problemy, perspektivy. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Publ., 2007, pp. 576–590.

Orlova T.V. Psychological difficulties of survivors of combat stress. Psikhologiya, sotsiologiya i pedagogika, 2018, no. 1, pp. 10–12.

Kobozev I. Yu. Psychoprevention and correction of a professional stress of staff of Department of Internal Affairs. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2016, no. 1, pp. 205–209.

Khozhenko E.V., Kiparisova E.S., Ekusheva E.V., Puzin M.N., Denishchuk I.S., Pryanikov I.V., Makkaeva S.M., Lepaev Yu.V., Afanasev B.G., Dymochka M.A., Tarasova L.A. The peculiarities of diagnostics and therapy of the posttraumatic stress disorder in the practice of a neurologist. Mediko-sotsialnaya ekspertiza i reabilitatsiya, 2017, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 158–161.

Lesnoy N. After the war. GEO, 2006, no. 2, pp. 104–109.

Vodopyanova N.E. Stress-menedzhment [Stress management]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2018. 283 p.

Nikiforova G.S., ed. Psikhologiya menedzhmenta [Management Psychology]. 2nd ed., dop. i pererab. Sankt Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2004. 639 p.

Rybnikov V.Yu. Express-method “Prognoz-2” for the assessment of neuropsychic instability. Tezisy dokladov na I vsearmeyskom soveshchanii. Moscow, Voenizdat Publ., 1990, pp. 132–135.

Yanshin P.V. Praktikum po klinicheskoy psikhologii: metody issledovaniya lichnosti [Clinical Psychology Workshop: Personality Research Methods]. Sankt Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2004. 336 p.

Fetiskin N.P., Kozlov V.V., Manuylov G.M. Sotsialno-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malykh grupp [Socio-psychological diagnosis of personal development and small groups]. 2nd ed., dop. Moscow, Psikhoterapiya Publ., 2009. 544 p.

Elizarov A.N. Osnovy individualnogo i semeynogo psikhologicheskogo konsultirovaniya [Basics of individual and family psychological counseling]. Moscow, Os’-89 Publ., 2003. 336 p.

Published
2019-06-26
Section
Psychological Sciences